Q.6: Right to Die under the Provisions of IPC
Q.6: Right to Die under the Provisions of IPC
Introduction: The concept of "Right to Die" in India has been a topic of legal and ethical debate for many years. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) addresses aspects of the right to die under the provisions related to "suicide," "assisted suicide," and "euthanasia." This discussion evaluates the legal position on the right to die and the evolving judicial interpretations.
1. Right to Die under the IPC:
Section 309 of IPC - Attempt to Suicide: Section 309 of the IPC criminalizes an attempt to commit suicide. It provides that any person who attempts suicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with a fine, or with both.
Section 309 IPC reads:
"Whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offense, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both."This provision has been heavily criticized for penalizing an individual in distress, and the Supreme Court has recognized the need to revisit this law in light of a person’s right to live with dignity.
2. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: While suicide is considered a criminal offense under the IPC, euthanasia (mercy killing) and assisted suicide are more nuanced issues, and the law has evolved on this front:
Active Euthanasia (causing death by a direct act, e.g., administering lethal injections) remains illegal in India.
Passive Euthanasia (withdrawing life support or allowing death to occur naturally) has been recognized under certain conditions in landmark Supreme Court judgments.
3. Supreme Court Judgment – Aruna Shanbaug Case (2011): The case of Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) was pivotal in recognizing the limited scope of euthanasia under Indian law. The Supreme Court permitted passive euthanasia under certain circumstances. In the case of patients in a vegetative state, the Court allowed the withdrawal of life support if it was proven that there was no chance of recovery, and the patient was in an irreversible coma.
4. Constitutional Perspective: The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to live with dignity, which has been interpreted to also imply the right to die with dignity. However, this right does not extend to the right to commit suicide.
In Gyan Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 309 IPC, asserting that the right to life does not include the right to die. However, in later judgments, especially in the Common Cause Case (2018), the Supreme Court distinguished between passive euthanasia and active euthanasia, allowing for the right to die with dignity in specific, severe cases of terminal illness.
5. Legal Status of Assisted Suicide: Currently, assisted suicide remains illegal in India. However, the matter has been referred to the Law Commission of India for further scrutiny, as the debate on the right to die with dignity continues to grow.
6. Key Legal Principles:
- Right to Die with Dignity: The Indian judiciary has increasingly recognized that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to live with dignity, which could extend to the right to choose a dignified death.
- Consent: In cases like euthanasia, consent from the individual (or family) is a critical factor in the decision-making process. The person must be in an irreversible state of coma, or terminally ill, with no chance of recovery.
Conclusion: While the IPC criminalizes suicide and attempted suicide under Section 309, the evolving judicial interpretation of the right to die in India focuses on ensuring the dignity of individuals, particularly in the context of passive euthanasia. The Supreme Court has taken progressive steps to safeguard the right to die with dignity in certain circumstances, though active euthanasia and assisted suicide remain illegal.
Comments
Post a Comment