Difference between cognizable and non-cognizable offences under CrPC

 In the context of the Indian Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), cognizable and non-cognizable offenses are distinguished primarily by the nature of police authority and the procedural steps involved. Here’s a brief overview of the differences:

Cognizable Offenses

  1. Definition: Cognizable offenses are those for which a police officer has the authority to arrest without a warrant and start an investigation without the permission of a magistrate.
  2. Examples: Serious crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, and kidnapping.
  3. Police Authority: Police can arrest the accused, conduct searches, and investigate the crime without the prior approval of a magistrate.
  4. Investigation: Investigation can commence immediately by the police, and the police have greater powers in handling these cases.
  5. Magistrate Involvement: After the investigation, the police must present a report (charge sheet) to the magistrate who then takes further legal action.

Non-Cognizable Offenses

  1. Definition: Non-cognizable offenses are those for which a police officer does not have the authority to arrest without a warrant and cannot start an investigation without the magistrate’s permission.
  2. Examples: Minor offenses such as petty theft, minor assault, and defamation.
  3. Police Authority: Police cannot arrest the accused or conduct searches without a warrant and the magistrate's prior permission.
  4. Investigation: Investigation into non-cognizable offenses can only begin after obtaining permission from the magistrate.
  5. Magistrate Involvement: For non-cognizable offenses, the aggrieved party generally has to approach the magistrate to initiate the legal process, usually by filing a complaint or FIR.

Understanding the distinction helps in comprehending the procedural requirements and the extent of police authority in different types of offenses.

Case Study

**Case Study: ** State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal (1992)

Facts: In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India considered the nature of cognizable and non-cognizable offenses in determining the power of the police to investigate and arrest without a warrant. The case involved allegations of wrongful restraint and other minor offenses.

Issue: The key issue was whether the police had the authority to investigate and make arrests in cases involving non-cognizable offenses.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that for non-cognizable offenses, the police do not have the power to arrest or investigate without explicit permission from a magistrate. The Court emphasized that the nature of the offense determines the extent of police authority

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Historical Background of Cyber Law in India

Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha : Role & Responsibilities

What is Cyber Jurisprudence? How Cyber Jurisprudence evolve ?

Explain Digital signature? What are legal requirements for validity of digital signature?

Copyrights, Patents, and Trademarks In IPR Cyber Space